I am very glad to start the new year (although we are already some weeks underway) with a successful conservation story and a very interesting one as well. The Kihanisi spray toad (Nectophrynoides asperginis), a dwarf toad the size of a human thumbnail, was discovered as recently as 1996 in a microhabitat of two hectares at the base of Kihansi Falls in Tanzania. Although the size of its habitat was very small, there were 17.000 individuals to be found living in it. Unfortunately the species only survived eight more years in the wild, due to the construction of a hydroelectric dam, that reduced the spray on the species’ microhabitat and the infamous chytridiomycosis fungus. But this is not where the story ends: due to a captive population in Bronx Zoo that produced large numbers of offspring, reintroduction became soon possible. However, the hydroelectric dam still made the original unsuitable for survival of the species. To overcome this problem conservationists built an artificial mist system in the Kihansi Gorge to re-establish the spray zone that is so critical for the survival of the species. And so, in November of last year the Kihansi spray toad was reintroduced to its original habitat that is now maintained by a man-made spray system. A very hopeful message comes from this, that we can use our technological skills to the benefit of another species as well.
Here I provide you with the original text of the article from mongabay.com
In 1996 scientists discovered a new species of dwarf toad: the Kihansi spray toad (Nectophrynoides asperginis). Although surviving on only two hectares near the Kihansi Gorge in Tanzania, the toads proved populous: around 17,000 individuals crowded the smallest known habitat of any vertebrate, living happily off the moist micro-habitat created by spray from adjacent waterfalls. Eight years later and the Kihansi spray toad was gone. Disease combined with the construction of a hydroelectric dam ended the toads’ limited, but fecund, reign. However, before the toad population collapsed completely conservationists with the Wildlife Conservation Society’s (WCS) Bronx Zoo were able to establish a captive population of 499 frogs. Now, researchers are releasing a seed population of Kihansi spray toads back into their native habitat, but with one caveat: an artificial “misting system” is the only thing standing between the tiny amphibians and a second extinction.
“As long as the hydroelectric dam persists, the misting system will be needed in order to provide sufficient ‘spray meadow’ habitat at the base of Kihansi Falls for the single Kihansi Spray Toad population to persist,” Don Church the President and Director of Wildlands Conservation with Global Wildlife Conservation told mongabay.com. “The energy company [running the dam], TANESCO, is mandated to allow some water over the dam so that the river and Kihansi Falls do not dry up. However, the spray zone generated by Kihansi Falls is vastly reduced compared to what it was before the dam was constructed.”
In what may be the first time conservationists have ever re-established an “extinct” species in a human-engineered ecosystem, conservationists released around 2,500 amphibians this week. The effort is a culmination of years of a work by multiple groups—the Tanzania’s National Environmental Management Council (NEMC), the University of Dar Salaam, the Toledo Zoo, WCS, the IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group, the IUCN SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group, and Global Wildlife Conservation—to save the toads from extinction and bring them back to their spray meadows.
The conservation work has moved remarkably fast. Today’s captive population has grown 12-fold from its beginning in 2004, while frogs are being released only three years after the IUCN announced they were extinct in the wild. “Most reintroductions for amphibians and reptiles have been designed to establish or augment a population of a rare species, but it is extremely exciting to be involved in actually returning a species that was extinct in the wild back to its native habitat.” said Kurt Buhlmann and Tracey Tuberville, research scientists with the University of Georgia’s Savannah River Ecology Laboratory.
The misting system, engineered especially for this issue, was developed as recompense for the environmental damage caused by the dam, which was funded by the World Bank and the government of Norway. “[It] diverts water from above the fall through a network of pipes with misting heads at regular intervals and effectively creates a spray zone over a broader area than the Kihansi Falls, in its current state, can generate,” Church explains. “The system is maintained to deliver 70 mm of ‘precipitation’ per day which was the average amount recorded in the “spray meadow” prior to the dam’s construction.” The manmade structure also includes bridges around the gorge where scientists can monitor the progress of the tiny frogs.
A brilliant yellow, the Kihansi spray toad is a small enough to fit on a human thumbnail, and unlike most amphibians actually bears live young. While the dam desiccated its habitat, the toad population also suffered from the killer chytridiomycosis fungus near the end. This amphibian disease, which has spread quickly worldwide, has already pushed a number of once abundant species to the brink and is one reason why amphibians are among the most endangered of the world’s animal groups. Currently, the IUCN Red List estimates that over 40 percent of amphibians are under threat, while more than 150 species are believed to have gone extinct since the early 1980s.
“The success story of the small Kihansi Spray Toad can teach us big lessons for the future of biodiversity conservation,” Claude Gascon, the co-chair of the IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group, Claude Gascon, said.
“While amphibians and other species are incurring severe threats to their survival, it is never too late to use the best science and conservation action to save a species and its habitat.” While the story of the Kihansi spray toad remains one of the happier ones for frogs lately, only time will tell if the toads will thrive in their engineered habitat—and, perhaps, only philosophers can tell us if a wild animal is still wild if it depends on a human-constructed ecosystem for survival.